NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 Third-Party Risk in 2026
NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 is the current C-SCRM reference. Here is what engineering and GRC teams should operationalize for third-party risk in 2026.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 is the current C-SCRM reference. Here is what engineering and GRC teams should operationalize for third-party risk in 2026.
GitHub Actions caches were never designed as a trust boundary. In 2025 researchers turned that mismatch into a repeatable supply-chain attack pattern.
Drata, Vanta, and Secureframe automate compliance evidence collection — but that's a different job from securing your software supply chain. Here's how Safeguard fits.
On August 24, 2024, Rhysida ransomware took down Port of Seattle systems including Sea-Tac airport check-in, baggage, and the Port website. The Port refused a $6 million ransom. We unpack the case.
Six tools generate SBOMs from Java projects. They disagree on transitive depth, license fields, and licensing of their own output. A head-to-head.
Serverless security protects function code, IAM roles, and event triggers where traditional host-based scanning and patching don't apply.
Drata and Vanta automate compliance evidence, but neither verifies the software supply chain. Here's what compliance automation covers, what it doesn't, and where Safeguard fits.
GitLab and GitHub both ship with defaults that prioritize usability. A head-to-head on the specific hardening steps each platform needs before it is safe for enterprise use.
Industry surveys and real-world data paint a sobering picture of DevSecOps automation maturity. Most organizations are still in the early stages despite years of investment.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.