Competitor Comparisons

How Safeguard.sh Compares

Zero CVE Start + IDE Extension + Self-Healing vs Scan-and-Alert

85% of breaches start with vulnerable dependencies. Compare Safeguard.sh's 6,000+ zero CVE components + NEW IDE Extension + autonomous self-healing against Snyk, GitHub, Checkmarx, Veracode, Black Duck, and Wiz. Start clean before deployment. Secure code as you write it. 100-level dependency depth (40 more than competitors). 80% fewer false positives. Deploy anywhere: Cloud, on-prem, air-gapped.

Quick Comparison

See how Safeguard.sh stacks up across key capabilities

Feature

Safeguard.sh

Snyk

GitHub

Checkmarx

Veracode

Black Duck

Wiz

Zero CVE Components (Start Clean vs Scan-and-Alert)
6,000+ zero CVE images + malware-free packages—eliminate inherited vulnerabilities before deployment
None—inherit vulnerabilities, scan after deployment
None—Dependabot fixes after deployment
None—traditional scanning approach
None—testing-focused only
None—policy enforcement only
None—runtime scanning only
IDE Extension (Security at Speed of Development)
NEW: VS Code, IntelliJ, PyCharm—auto-fix as you code (95% developer adoption)
IDE plugins—alert-only, no auto-fix
Copilot—code generation, limited security
No IDE extension
No IDE extension
No IDE extension
No IDE extension
Dependency Depth (How Deep Can You See?)
100-level tracing—found vuln 87 levels deep (40 more than competitors)
~60 levels—misses deeply nested threats
Direct + limited transitive
Limited analysis depth
Limited transitive scanning
Standard depth analysis
Runtime scanning only
False Positives (Alert Fatigue vs Focus)
80% reduction with reachability analysis—only exploitable vulnerabilities
High (92% false positive rate)—alerts on all CVEs
High—no reachability context
High—requires manual triage
High—reports all vulnerabilities
High—policy violations without context
Moderate—runtime context
Remediation Approach (Autonomous vs Manual)
Autonomous Auto-Fix—92% faster (45 days → 3 days), no manual approval
Alert-based—manual fixing (weeks of delays)
Dependabot PRs—manual review required
Reports—manual remediation workflows
Scan reports—manual developer fixing
Policy alerts—manual remediation
Cloud alerts—manual fixing
On-Prem & Air-Gap Support (Deploy Anywhere)
NEW: CLI tool works offline—IL7 compliance in air-gapped networks
Cloud-only SaaS—no air-gap support
Cloud-only—no air-gap support
Limited on-prem (legacy versions)
Cloud-only SaaS
Limited on-prem support
Cloud-only—no air-gap
Cloud Coverage (True Cloud-Agnostic)
15+ clouds (AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle, and 11 more) + on-prem + air-gap
3 major clouds (AWS, Azure, GCP)
GitHub-centric
Limited cloud support
SaaS-only
Limited deployment options
5 major clouds
SBOM Lifecycle
Complete lifecycle + EO 14028 attestation
Basic exports
Basic dependency graphs
Component lists
Basic SCA reporting
Generation + exports
Runtime discovery
Federal Compliance
FedRAMP HIGH, IL7, SOC 2 Type II Ready
SOC 2
SOC 2 Type II
Limited federal architecture
FedRAMP Moderate, SOC 2
Enterprise compliance
SOC 2, ISO 27001
Third-Party Risk
Dedicated TPRM with vendor SBOM validation
None
None
None
None
None
Cloud vendor assessment only
AI Capabilities
Griffin AI—purpose-built for SSCS
DeepCode AI—retrofitted
CodeQL—static analysis
AI-augmented SAST
No AI autonomy
Rule-based policies
No supply chain AI

Why Choose Safeguard.sh?

Zero
CVE Guarantee
6,000+ Certified Components
100
Dependency Levels
vs. Competitors' 60 Levels
80%
Fewer False Positives
Reachability Analysis
15
Cloud Providers
True Cloud-Agnostic

Ready to See the Difference?

Schedule a demo to see how Safeguard.sh's autonomous self-healing delivers outcomes competitors can't match