Competitor Comparison

Safeguard.sh vs Checkmarx

Zero CVE Start + AI-Native vs Legacy SAST

Checkmarx provides traditional SAST with manual workflows after deployment. Safeguard.sh starts you clean with 6,000+ zero CVE images and packages, then delivers AI-native supply chain security with Griffin AI's autonomous remediation across 100-level dependency depth. See why starting with zero CVE components and continuous self-healing beats periodic scanning.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

AI-native supply chain security vs legacy SAST platform

Zero CVE Components

Safeguard.sh

3,000+ zero CVE images + 3,000+ Gold packages—malware-free from day one

Checkmarx

None—traditional scan-and-fix after deployment

Architecture

Safeguard.sh

AI-native, cloud-native built from ground up for supply chain security

Checkmarx

Legacy SAST platform—retrofitted for modern threats

Remediation

Safeguard.sh

Autonomous Auto-Fix with Griffin AI—no manual approval, fixes in minutes

Checkmarx

Manual remediation workflows—generates reports requiring developer action

Dependency Depth

Safeguard.sh

100-level dependency tracing—finds threats 40+ levels deeper

Checkmarx

Limited dependency analysis—misses deeply nested supply chain threats

False Positives

Safeguard.sh

80% fewer with reachability analysis—only shows exploitable vulnerabilities

Checkmarx

High false positive rate—requires significant manual triage

Cloud Deployment

Safeguard.sh

15 cloud providers, on-premises, air-gapped—true infrastructure flexibility

Checkmarx

Limited cloud support—primarily SaaS with some self-hosted options

Supply Chain Coverage

Safeguard.sh

Complete SSCS: code, containers, AI models, CI/CD, SBOM, TPRM, Gold packages

Checkmarx

SAST/SCA focused—limited container, SBOM, and third-party risk coverage

Scan Performance

Safeguard.sh

Continuous incremental scanning—real-time feedback without pipeline delays

Checkmarx

Batch scanning (hours for large codebases)—blocks CI/CD pipelines

SBOM Lifecycle

Safeguard.sh

Complete lifecycle: generation, enrichment, validation, distribution, monitoring, attestation

Checkmarx

Basic SCA component lists—no SBOM lifecycle management

Federal Compliance

Safeguard.sh

FedRAMP HIGH, IL7, SOC 2 Type II ready—compliance-ready architecture designed for federal requirements

Checkmarx

Limited federal compliance architecture—not designed for IL7 or FedRAMP HIGH

AI Capabilities

Safeguard.sh

Griffin AI purpose-built for SSCS with autonomous OODA loop and self-healing

Checkmarx

AI-augmented SAST—not purpose-built for autonomous supply chain security

Why Choose Safeguard.sh Over Checkmarx?

Purpose-Built AI Architecture

Checkmarx retrofitted AI into legacy SAST. Griffin AI was architected from day one for autonomous supply chain security—not general-purpose AI adapted for security. Purpose-built OODA loop for continuous threat response.

Supply Chain vs Code Scanning

Checkmarx focuses on SAST/SCA of source code. Safeguard.sh protects the entire supply chain: dependencies 100 levels deep, containers in any registry, AI models, third-party vendors, and curated Gold packages.

Autonomous vs Manual Workflows

Checkmarx generates security reports requiring manual developer fixing and approval workflows. Griffin AI autonomously fixes vulnerabilities and deploys remediations—no manual intervention, no delays, no backlogs.

Reachability-Based Prioritization

Checkmarx reports all potential vulnerabilities without exploitation context—high false positive rate requiring manual triage. Safeguard.sh uses reachability analysis—80% fewer false positives showing only exploitable threats.

Modern Cloud-Native Architecture

Checkmarx legacy architecture has performance issues with large codebases. Safeguard.sh cloud-native architecture provides continuous incremental scanning—real-time feedback without pipeline delays across 15 cloud providers.

Complete SBOM Lifecycle

Checkmarx provides component inventory lists. Safeguard.sh Portal manages complete SBOM lifecycle: auto-generation, enrichment, validation, secure distribution, continuous monitoring, and EO 14028 attestation for federal compliance.

When Safeguard.sh Beats Checkmarx

Slow Scan Performance

Problem with Checkmarx: Checkmarx SAST scans take hours for large codebases—blocking CI/CD pipelines and delaying releases
Safeguard.sh Solution: Safeguard.sh provides continuous incremental scanning—real-time feedback as code changes with minimal performance impact

Manual Remediation Backlogs

Problem with Checkmarx: Checkmarx security reports create developer backlogs—manual fixing and approval workflows take weeks
Safeguard.sh Solution: Griffin AI autonomously fixes vulnerabilities in minutes with Auto-Fix pull requests—no manual intervention or approval delays

Deep Supply Chain Threats

Problem with Checkmarx: Checkmarx limited dependency analysis misses threats in deeply nested transitive dependencies
Safeguard.sh Solution: Griffin AI traces 100-level dependency depth—finding supply chain threats Checkmarx can't see

False Positive Fatigue

Problem with Checkmarx: Checkmarx high false positive rate requires significant manual triage—teams spend more time investigating than fixing
Safeguard.sh Solution: Safeguard.sh reachability analysis eliminates 80% of false positives—teams focus only on exploitable vulnerabilities

Multi-Cloud and Air-Gap Requirements

Problem with Checkmarx: Your infrastructure requires deployment across multiple clouds or air-gapped environments—Checkmarx has limited support
Safeguard.sh Solution: Safeguard.sh deploys across 15 cloud providers, on-premises, and air-gapped environments with complete tenant isolation

Ready to Move Beyond Legacy SAST?

See how Safeguard.sh's AI-native architecture delivers autonomous remediation with 80% fewer false positives