DAST Vendors Compared: Picking a Dynamic Scanning Tool
Choosing among DAST vendors hinges on how well the scanner authenticates, crawls modern apps and APIs, and fits into CI without turning into a manual chore.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Choosing among DAST vendors hinges on how well the scanner authenticates, crawls modern apps and APIs, and fits into CI without turning into a manual chore.
Runc escapes, exposed Docker APIs, malicious registry images: the Docker vulnerabilities actually driving incidents in 2024-2025, and how to triage what's exploitable.
A DAST automated test probes your running application for vulnerabilities the way an attacker would, on every build. Here is how it works and the benefits of wiring it into CI.
False positives waste engineering time; false negatives cause breaches. A verifiable, metrics-based look at how Safeguard and Checkmarx approach scan accuracy.
A vulnerability assessment solution finds, ranks, and tracks weaknesses across your systems. Here is what separates a useful one from a report generator.
Base image choice drives most of your container's attack surface. Here's what secure Docker base images actually require, with concrete CVE data.
CVE-2017-18342 lets attackers achieve remote code execution via PyYAML's yaml.load(), which deserialized untrusted YAML into live Python objects by default.
Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing solve different problems. Here's how Safeguard's supply chain approach compares to Checkmarx's AppSec platform.
CVE-2020-1747 shows PyYAML's FullLoader and full_load() could still trigger arbitrary code execution on untrusted YAML before 5.3.1. Here's the full breakdown.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.