Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Not all software comes with source code. Binary analysis techniques can extract component information from compiled artifacts, firmware, and commercial software to produce SBOMs where traditional tools cannot.
Most SBOM quality discussions stop at completeness. Real quality requires measuring accuracy, freshness, depth, and actionability. Here is a practical framework.
An SBOM tells you what's in your software, not whether it's safe. Here's why inventory alone can't stop supply chain attacks like XZ Utils or SolarWinds.
Most companies generate SBOMs to satisfy a compliance checkbox, then let them sit unread. Here is why SBOM consumption lags generation, and how to close the gap.
SBOM mandates now span the US, EU, and Japan, but each uses different formats, deadlines, and penalties. Here's how the patchwork actually works.
SBOMs list every component but stay silent on whether a CVE is actually exploitable. VEX documents supply that missing context — here's how the standard works.
SBOMs decay the moment they're generated because dependency trees shift daily. Here's why point-in-time SBOMs fail during real incidents—and what continuous generation requires.
AI-BOMs extend SBOM discipline to machine learning models—tracking training data, weights, and lineage. Here's what they contain and why regulators now require them.
A vendor's SBOM is a claim, not proof. Here's what actually verifies third-party software bills of materials — and why signatures alone aren't enough.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.
