Evaluating a SAST tool for a monorepo: eight checks
A checklist for testing static analysis on a monorepo: project detection, directory ownership, scan scope, mixed languages, timeouts and result routing.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
A checklist for testing static analysis on a monorepo: project detection, directory ownership, scan scope, mixed languages, timeouts and result routing.
A short test plan for static analysis IDE plugins: install effort, speed, noise while typing, fix help and whether results match the pull request check.
Which paths to exclude from static analysis, which to keep, and how to manage exclusions so noise drops without creating blind spots in your coverage.
Write six tiny code samples to see how deeply a static analysis tool follows data across functions, files, sanitisers and frameworks before you buy it.
Do you need to write your own static analysis rules? How to judge rule authoring effort, testing, sharing and upkeep, and when default rules are enough.
Static analysis tools now suggest fixes. How to test whether those suggestions are correct, safe to merge, and worth paying for, using your own findings.
GitHub rejects SARIF over 10 MB gzipped and keeps only the top 5,000 results per run. Here are the limits and how to stay inside them.
GitHub reads a security-severity score on each SARIF rule and maps it to critical, high, medium or low. Learn the cutoffs and what the level field does.
Duplicate code scanning alerts usually mean the SARIF file lacks partialFingerprints or file paths changed between runs. Here is how matching works.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.