Continuous Eval & Release Gating: Griffin AI vs Mythos
Evals that run once are marketing. Evals that run on every build are infrastructure. Griffin AI runs the harness on every change; Mythos does not describe one.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Evals that run once are marketing. Evals that run on every build are infrastructure. Griffin AI runs the harness on every change; Mythos does not describe one.
GitHub Copilot suggests fixes. Griffin AI generates fix PRs with taint paths and disproof attached. The difference is review burden.
Autonomous coding agents can escalate privilege in subtle ways that traditional threat models miss. A breakdown of the common escalation paths and how to constrain them.
Open-weight models let you run everything locally. The tradeoff is quality, cost, and operational overhead. Griffin AI provides a different answer to the same on-prem need.
Injection vulnerabilities are not really about the sink. They are about the path from untrusted input to the sink. The path is where Griffin AI and Mythos-class tools diverge.
A false positive is not free. It costs engineer attention, trust in the tool, and eventually the security programme's credibility. We price the difference.
A complete walkthrough of the modern remediation pipeline, from advisory ingestion through merged and deployed fix, with every stage that actually matters.
Data residency for AI workloads has moved from nice-to-have to contractually required. The shape of the requirement is specific and worth knowing before procurement.
Fine-tuning inherits every problem of the base model and adds dataset provenance as a new one. Here is how detection actually works in practice.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.