Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Tenable's Linguistic Lumberjack flaw in Fluent Bit's monitoring API was a heap corruption with a wide blast radius because observability sidecars are everywhere and rarely inventoried.
A security-focused comparison of Flux 2.5 and Argo CD 3.1: trust models, multi-tenancy, secret handling, signature verification, and the operational differences.
The Federal Trade Commission has spent the last several years building a software-security enforcement theory under Section 5. Drizly, SolarWinds, and Henry Schein each contributed pieces of the framework.
npm audit catches known CVEs and stops there. It misses malicious packages, install scripts, and typosquats -- the threats actually landing in npm today.
Between firmware and the kernel sits a thin layer of code that almost no one audits and almost everyone trusts. Understanding the supply chain behind shim, GRUB, and u-boot is the difference between owning your boot path and renting it.
Between 2023 and 2024 the VS Code Marketplace saw a string of typosquat, hijack, and impersonation incidents that shaped Microsoft's eventual hardening response. This is a composite postmortem of what happened, what changed, and what is still broken in 2026.
SAST, DAST, SCA, and IAST each test different risk. See how Safeguard's unified platform compares to Socket.dev's SCA-focused approach to supply chain security.
SOC 2 audits fail on missing evidence, not bad intentions. Here's what engineering teams must actually build, track, and prove — with real timelines and costs.
CVE tells you a flaw exists, CVSS rates severity, EPSS predicts exploitation, and SSVC drives decisions. Here's how Safeguard and Socket.dev use each differently.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.
