Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
A single forgotten credential at Klue exposed Salesforce CRM data at 14+ companies, including Snyk and Huntress—here's what it teaches about vendor risk.
GitHub lets you export an SPDX SBOM in two clicks, but the file only reflects what its dependency graph can see. Here's what's missing and how Safeguard fills it.
Ten concrete Docker image security practices — minimal base images, secret handling, reachability-based scanning, non-root runtimes, and SBOMs — with real CVEs and data.
SAST, DAST, and IAST each test different things. Here's how Checkmarx positions its platform, and where Safeguard's supply chain approach fits alongside it.
Runc escapes, exposed Docker APIs, malicious registry images: the Docker vulnerabilities actually driving incidents in 2024-2025, and how to triage what's exploitable.
False positives waste engineering time; false negatives cause breaches. A verifiable, metrics-based look at how Safeguard and Checkmarx approach scan accuracy.
Base image choice drives most of your container's attack surface. Here's what secure Docker base images actually require, with concrete CVE data.
Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing solve different problems. Here's how Safeguard's supply chain approach compares to Checkmarx's AppSec platform.
Distroless images cut container size by up to 90% and eliminate OS-level CVEs, but they don't secure app dependencies. Here's how they work and where they fall short.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.
